| S.No. |
Issues
raised |
Comments
and Action taken |
|
Issues Raised at Chandigarh
I. Foreign Trade Policy(FTP) related issues |
|
1 |
Denomination
of Export Contracts – to allow benefits under FTP for payment
received in ACU $. |
It was
clarified that ACU$ is equal to US$ in value and receipt and payment
channeled through ACU Mechanism are deemed to have been received in US $
and therefore all exports benefits would be available to exports made
under ACU mechanism |
|
2 |
Grant
of Duty Scrip to status Holders for Agricultural Exports @ 10% of FOB
value – procedure & application needs to be notified. |
It was
decided that the procedure for the facility would be finalized within
two weeks time. |
|
3 |
Extension
of Focus Product Benefit to Floor covering under Residual Category –
ITC (HS) 5705 & 5704 |
Since
it was an omission at the time of last corrections in Handicraft items
notified under the scheme, it was decided to issue a PN for
inclusion of the product under Focus Product Scheme. |
|
4 |
Problem
under DFIA Scheme |
|
|
|
(i) For
exports without availing CENVAT facility, exemption from CVD against
DFIA (whether transferred or not) should be allowed, instead of the
provision of Duty DBK for the same. |
It was
informed that a formulation allowing the CVD exemption in such cases
have already been forwarded to DoR, who, in turn, have also consented
for the same. So it was decided to take up the matter again with DoR
for issuance of corresponding amendment in the Customs Notification
and amendment in FTP can also be done accordingly within 2 weeks time.
A meeting would be called between DGFT & Member (Customs) in this
week to sort out the issue. |
|
|
(ii) For
DFIA prior to 19.4.07, imports to be permitted without any duty component.
At present RAs have allowed complete exemption only for DFIAs already
endorsed with transferability on or before 31.3.07. |
It was
informed that since there was leakage of revenue (excise duty) in the form
of double benefit, CVD exemption for CENVATable products can not be
allowed beyond 31.3.07. However for cases already endorsed with
transferability on or before 31.3.07, a reference would be made to
DoR with facts and figures for early resolution of the stalemate
in such cases. Matter would be sorted out within 15 days. It would also be
discussed in the next meeting of DGFT and Member (Customs). |
|
5 |
Partial
redemption & Transferability of DFIA – For flexibility in
operation. At times realisation takes a longer time for entire exports
for shipment against a particular DFIA File Nos. |
Proposal
was accepted in principle. The said facility was available during
manual processing of erstwhile transferable advance licences. Software
package for the same would be developed by NIC in consultation with
policy division so that it becomes applicable within 15 days |
|
6 |
Grant
of DFIA against exports made to Russia in non-convertible Indian Rupee |
It was
clarified that the said facility as applicable in case of advance
authorization would also be available for DFIA. RA, Ludhiana would
dispose off the pending such cases accordingly. A
clarification to this effect would also be issued by DGFT Hqr. |
| 7 |
To
enhance the limit of 20% of FOB value for DTA sale of Instant Tea
(whereas 50% available for others) under EOU Scheme. |
FIEO
would provide facts and figures from domestic concern point of view
and thereafter matter would be examined by the policy division for
appropriate action. |
| 8 |
Export
Obligation under EPCG Scheme |
|
|
(i)
Calculation of average export obligation under EPCG Scheme –
Restoration of earlier provision of average based on exports of same
or similar product. |
It was
informed that the matter would be discussed with Member (Customs) so
that the issue is resolved within 15 days time. Issue related
to maintenance of Average and the eligibility under the Scheme to be
put up early to DGFT. |
|
(ii)
Deduction of the export value shown for export obligation fulfillment
under EPCG Scheme for the purpose of extending benefits of the schemes of
Chapter III related to reward/incentive schemes |
DGFT agreed
to get the matter examined as it is affecting exports to FOCUS countries.
|
| II. Hand
Book of Procedures (HBP) Related issues |
| 9 |
Electronic
Data Interchange (EDI) Benefits – Delay in availability of D/B
details in DGFT website DEPBs in such cases may be issued based in
original copies of S/Bs to be submitted by exporters in case of delay
in availability of S/B details on link. |
It was
informed that 95% of the E-commerce data transmission problem would be
over within a short time. Help desk officials at Hqr. are available
upto 7 pm on week days. A PN would be issued by Monday allowing
time period for filing such DEPB application within 12 months from the
date of appearance of DEPB shipping bill details in the DGFT website.
FIEO
would provide information on the stations where help desk facility is
required within 7 days time and immediately thereafter necessary
instructions would be issued by Hqr. Toll free No. would also be
provided for all such centres. |
| 10 |
Delay
in settlement of Focus Product Applications at Panipat office-
Software non-availability. |
It was
informed that the matter would be sorted out by Monday i.e, by
24.9.07. |
| 11 |
Proof
of landing under Focus Market Scheme and acceptance of BRC or B/L as
proof. |
It
was agreed to that the facility of PN 30 dated 24.08.07 shall be
extended to cover shipments from 1.4.2006 instead from 1.4.2007.
FIEO
would provide the alternative document for its implementation and
thereafter n/a to be taken by Policy Division. |
| 12 |
Grant
of DFIA – RA, Ludhiana not allowing alternative inputs without
detail of inputs used available in the S/Bs. |
To
decide in one weeks’ time. To put up on file.
|
| 13 |
Consumable
be allowed under EPCG Scheme as was available prior to 1.4.2007. |
It was
decided that FIEO would provide the details for the consumables
required under EPCG scheme. |
| 14 |
Fulfillment
of Export Obligation under EPCG Scheme |
|
|
(i)
Chartered Accountant Certificate may be accepted for redemption of E.O.
instead of the present requirement S/B copies; to dispense with the
requirement mentioned in EPCG licence No. & date on S/Bs. |
It was
not agreed to. However in case of bonafide mistake, such cases could
be referred to RA concerned. |
|
(ii)
Average for Fresh EPCG authorisation to be built upon last average
of EO and additional EO not with standing actual export achievements –
Restoration of earlier provision |
It was
informed that the issue would be examined and the matter would be taken up
with DoR for early resolution within 2 weeks time. |
|
(iii) Fresh
EPCG authorisation to be issued only after completion of average EO of
earlier EPCG authorisation – Since block year stipulation is available,
earlier provision may be restored. |
It
was informed that the issue would be examined and the matter would be
taken up with DoR for early resolution within 2 weeks time.
|
| III. General
Issues |
| 15 |
Refund
of terminal Excise Duty for domestic procurement of capital goods
under EPCG Scheme: |
|
|
(i)
Non-release of funds – working capital blocked. |
It was
informed that the required fund
would be provided shortly for clearance of pending cases. |
|
(ii)
Exemption from excise duty payment on indigenous procurement facility
should made available instead of refund |
Not agreed
to. |
| 16 |
TUF
Scheme- operative guidelines regarding the eligibility and amount of
TUF subsidy on the terms loans not yet issued by M/o Textiles |
It
was informed that Ministry of Textiles have circulated a draft Cabinet
Note for the purpose. However, a DO letter from DG to Secretary
(Textiles) would be issued with a request to expedite the matter. |
| 17 |
(i)
Help Desk at DGFT Online system – complaint No. is not being
conveyed and cases are not settled. |
It was
informed that official has been made available upto 7 pm on weekdays.
Now the system has stabilized and complaint No. is conveyed in each
& every case. Hqr would ensure un-interrupted help in the
matter and take up issues with DG (SYSTEM) as well for removal of
E-commerce transmission bottlenecks, if any. A copy of the
representation received from M/s Sigma Freudenberg NOK, Mohali being
sent) today for immediate n/a and intimation to the firm accordingly. |
|
(ii) S/Bs
for DEPB scheme not appearing in the DGFT website thereby leading to
difficulty in filing online application.
Non
appearance of DEPB licences issued on the Customs site.
Representation
received from M/s Sigma Freudenberg NOK, Mohali on non appearance of DEPB
issued to them at Customs site. |
|
IV. Individual Issues
|
| 18 |
EO
against EPCG licence of 1998 and 1999 fulfilled in Rs. terms not in $
terms – short fall in EO under 5% condonation clause to be allowed
for average EO also. (M/s. Majestic Auto Limited, Ludhiana) |
It was
clarified that 5% shortfall condonation allowed in the FTP is
applicable to additional E.O. only and not the average E.O.
Clarificatory Memorandum would be issued once the EPCG issued are
settled with DoR. Since in the present case E.O. seems to have been
fulfilled in Rupee terms and not in freely convertible currency terms,
it was decided to take a decision in this case on file. |
| 19 |
To
consider the Limited Cos. as Group Co. for the purpose of
TPS benefit for 2005-06 in line with the benefit given in
2004-05. (M/s. Sportking India Limited, Ludhiana) |
M/s.
Sportking India Limited, Ludhiana would apply to DGFT Hqr. with
details of the case for taking a decision.
|
| 20 |
Mohali
Industries Association may be allowed to issue Certificate of Origin
– Non-Preferential. |
It
was informed to the association that they need to apply as per the ANF
notified for the purpose along with required documents through the RA
concerned.
|
|
V. Other Issues raised (Supplementary
Agenda)
|
| 21 |
RA,
Ludhiana not attesting the list of spares under EPCG Schemes – Non
clearance of cargo by customs thereof. |
It was
decided that while in this case RA, Ludhiana may attest the list of
spares for early clearance at Customs end. On Policy issue of
non-requirement of attestation by RA as per existing FTP provision, it
was decided to take it up with DoR. |
| 22 |
EPCG
Scheme – In case of damage in CG before completion of installation,
E.O. to be reduced proportionately, based on Indemnity given by
licence. (Issue raised by M/s Vardaman Industries) |
It was
informed that in case of occurrence of such an incidence, it may be
reported to the RA concerned for taking appropriate action for
relaxation of existing provision of E.O. fulfillment in such cases. |
| 23 |
ANF-8
related to Deemed Export DBK and TED refund not activated in DGFT
website – Non availability of the format. Exporters using old
format. |
It was
informed that the required ANF would be available by Tuesday . |
| 24 |
Advance
Authorisation Scheme –
(i)
In case of Multi-unit companies, though Advance authorisation scheme
provided for transfer of inputs among the units following the Central
Excise procedure, corresponding CE Notification not yet issued to make
it effective. |
(i)
It was informed that though the facility is available as per Central Excise
Rules and Regulation, DoR would be requested to clarify the matter early to
its field formations. A reference would be made to Member (Customs) by
Tuesday so that the matter is sorted out within ten days time.
|
|
(ii)
Penalty of 1% in case of valuewise shortfall being insisted by RA
Ludhiana even in case of NIL export where customs duty and interest
has been paid for the import made (Para 4.28 of HBP v1) |
(ii)
RA, Ludhiana was informed to see the minutes of PIC Meeting dated
31-8-07 where the same was clarified. It was also decided to
inform RA, Ludhiana accordingly. |
| 25 |
DEPB
benefit should be made available for supplies from DTA to units under
EOU scheme in line with the facility available to SEZ units. |
Though
it was informed that DEPB scheme has been extended only against
realization in free foreign exchange against physical exports only,
the matter would be examined in consultation with DoR. |
| 26 |
In the
E.O. discharge certificate, RAs are not mentioning the details of S/Bs
leading to delay in redemption of Bank Guarantee/LUT by customs. |
It was
decided to issue a PN to this effect and make appropriate provision in
the E.O. discharge certificate itself. |
| 27 |
Waiver
of the requirement of NOC from Rubber Board in case of import of
Natural Rubber under Advance Authorisation Scheme – Needs amendment
of 2001 Notification. (Important to reduce delay and transaction
cost.) |
Party
was requested to submit detailed representation for matter to be
looked into. |
| 28 |
To
include Hand Tools in Focus Product Scheme. |
Matter
would be examined on file. |
| 29 |
DFIA
Scheme – To allow alternate inputs as in case of erstwhile DFRC
Scheme (in line with Policy Circular No.30 for DFRC Scheme). |
Matter
would be put up on file for issuance of appropriate clarification
within a week time. |
| 30 |
Duty
free import of R & D Instruments under Cus. Not No. 21/2002—Presently
120 outdated instruments mentioned therein should be replaced by the
clause "Any instrument to be installed in R & D wing be duty
free". (Sl. No. 3 of the suggestions given by The Amritsar
Exporters Chamber of Commerce) |
Matter
would be taken up with DoR. |
| 31 |
EPCG
scheme should be made "0" duty scheme instead of present 5%
scheme. (Sl. No. 4 of the suggestions given by The Amritsar
Exporters Chamber of Commerce) |
Matter
would be examined for next years’ policy. Similar request made
earlier in January 2007 to DoR was not accepted by them. EPCG policy
division may examine the matter for taking it up with DoR. |
| 32 |
DFIA
scheme — Minimum Value Addition requirement should be brought down
to 5- 10% instead of 20% at present. (Sl No. 5 of the suggestions
given by The Amritsar Exporters Chamber of Commerce) |
It
was not agreed by DoR. However the issue may be taken up with DoR
again during Annual FTP exercise.
|
| 33 |
Advance
Authorisation Scheme —To amend the Cus Notn No. 43/2002 &
93/2004 to allow facility of Rule 18 (rebate of duty paid on materials
used in the manufacture of resultant product) or sub-rule (2) of 19 of
the Central Excise Rules. – Delay in release of bond by Customs even
after EODC issued by DGFT. (Sl No. 7 of the suggestions given by
The Amritsar Exporters Chamber of Commerce). |
It’s
a fact that rebate should also be made available for exports under
Advance Authorisation scheme. Matter may be taken up during Annual
Policy. |
| 34 |
Facility
of extension in EOP in case of advance authorization issued for import
of Penicillin G, 6 APA & its salt. At present, under para 4.22.1
of HBP, 6 months time period is allowed as EOP and no further
extension. (Sl No. 8 of the suggestions given by The Amritsar
Exporters Chamber of Commerce) |
PHARMAXIL
to give a detailed representation for examination for policy
decision. Letter to be issued to Pharmaxil. |
| 35 |
Anomaly
in the SION for Pharmaceutical products where the wastage has been
fixed taking into account the most efficient process. Need for
revision of SION based on average industry consumption norms. (Sl
No. 9 of the suggestions given by The Amritsar Exporters Chamber of
Commerce) |
Matter
was discussed in the meeting and the firm M/s Parabolic Drugs Ltd,
Chandigarh was informed that since I – O Norms vary from unit to
unit depending on the technological efficiency and the process of
manufacturing, average of the industry norms is taken in case of
similar line and process of production. Firm was advised to apply in
the relevant ANF with the documents prescribed therein for fixation of
SION accordingly. |
| 36 |
Discharge
of E.O. under EPCG scheme (Para 5.7.1 of HBP Vol. 1) – No procedure
laid down for export by post parcel and the endorsement of EPCG
licence No. therein. (Sl No. 10 of the suggestions given by The
Amritsar Exporters Chamber of Commerce) |
Matter
would be examined and put up on file by EPCG policy division for
taking appropriate action. |
| 37 |
Bonded
Warehouse/ Pvt Bonded Warehouse may be allowed to be specified as Port
of import i.e., Port of Registration (in line with the facility
available for SEZ) under EPCG scheme. (Sl No. 12 of the suggestions
given by The Amritsar Exporters Chamber of Commerce) |
Detailed
representation highlighting the nature of problem being faced has to
be provided by the Association. Thereafter, matter would be
examined and put up on file by EPCG policy division for taking
appropriate action. |
| 38 |
EPCG
scheme— EPCG Authorisations issued from 1.4.07 to 18.4.07 to
be treated as Authorisations issued under the provisions available
prior to the announcement of Annual Supplement of FTP on 19.4.07. (Sl
No. 13 of the suggestions given by The Amritsar Exporters Chamber of
Commerce) |
Not
agreed to. Policy made applicable from 1.4.2007. |
| 39 |
Incentives
should be provided to Status Certificate holders in line with the
erstwhile Target Plus Scheme. (Sl No. 14 of the suggestions given
by The Amritsar Exporters Chamber of Commerce) |
Association
may provide detailed representation for the same for examination at
the end of DGFT. We may await for suggestions to be received during
Annual exercise for policy formulation. |
| 40 |
VKGUY
scheme – Due to non up-dation of new product in the software for
filing VKGUY scheme application electronically, manual filing of
application may be allowed. – (M/s Nector Lifesciences Ltd.— (Sl
No. 15 of the suggestions given by The Amritsar Exporters Chamber of
Commerce) |
If
there is any problem, matter would be sorted out immediately.
|
| Issues
Raised at Baddi (HP) |
| 1 |
Sunset
clause for 100% EOUs may be extended beyond 31.3.09. |
Though
the proposal was not earlier accepted by DoR, it may be again taken up
as Pre- Budget proposal. |
| 2 |
Govt.
may work out on extending Limited Hedging Concept (Time bound
revaluation and protection) |
Detailed
proposal needs to be submitted by the BBN Association for taking it up
with the appropriate authority. |
| 3 |
Incentives
should be linked to value added chain. (e.g., export of iron ore
should not be incentivised) |
Presently
except for agricultural products, none of the reward schemes are
available for the prime raw material export. |
| 4 |
Industry
to be provided finance under pre-export and post-export scheme at
LIBOR |
Matter
may be examined in the Next Policy. |
| 5 |
Export
by road to Pakistan – to make appropriate infrastructural
facility. |
To be
referred to Infra Division of Department of Commerce. |
| 6 |
To
include Saffron under VKGUY |
Matter
would be examined by Policy Division. |
| 7 |
In case
of exports by ultimate exporters: |
|
|
(i)Though
the ultimate exporter is entitled for DEPB, the supplier of packaging
material to such ultimate exporter should also be entitled for deemed
export benefit. |
(i)Under
DEPB scheme, no such facility is available because DEPB scheme takes
care of customs component of the raw material. The ultimate exporter
may avail Brand rate of DBK for the excise component for the packing
material as well.
|
|
(ii)
Such exports by ultimate exporter should also be counted towards
fulfillment of export obligation by the supplier of packaging material
against the capital goods imported by the supplier under EPCG
Scheme. |
(ii)Exports
by ultimate exporter would be counted for fulfillment of export
obligation provided the name of the supplier is also shown in the S/B
along with the file No. or EPCG Authorisation No. of the supplier
unit.
We
may inform the Association accordingly both for (i) & (ii) above. |
| 8 |
To
allow exemption/refund/CENVAT credit of 4% SAD for inputs
imported for exports – in view of the recent Notification of Customs
allowing refund of this duty to traders on their re-sale and payment
of VAT or sales tax. |
It
was informed that the 4% SAD component is neutralized against exports
in all the existing Duty Neutralisation schemes. |
| 9 |
Valuation
problem in case of import of 2nd hand capital goods by the customs –
not allowing the duty assessment based on the actual price in view of
1987 customs circular which allows depreciation upto 30% of the
original cost of the capital goods for the purpose of arriving at
applicable duty. |
Matter
may be examined and put up on file so that if required, the same can
be taken up with Department of Revenue for next years’ policy. |
| 10 |
Self
assessment and sealing facility for export cargo should be extended by
Central Excise in line with the same facility available to them in
case of domestic sales. At present export cargo is required to be
sealed in presence of Central Excise official only. Alternatively
after payment of excise duty at the time of taking it out of factory
for export, claim for refund to be filed before the Jurisdictional
Excise Authority (Maritime Commissionarate). Both these procedures
involve transaction time and cost. |
Procedural
simplification issue. When the facility of self clearance is available
for domestic sales, removal of goods for export may also be allowed to
such units without the requirement of Central Excise official to be
present at the time of removal. We may take up as a trade facilitation
measure with Department of Revenue for next years’ policy.
|
| 11 |
Non
Preferential certificate of origin for Baddi-Brotiwala-Nalagarh
Industries Association. |
Association
was informed to apply for it with details in the ANF prescribed for
the purpose. |
| 12 |
Allocation
of funds under ASIDE Scheme: |
For (i)
& (ii), matter may be taken up with DoC. |
|
(i)Budget
allocation needs to be increased for H.P. |
|
|
(ii)
Allocation should be based on future prospective export projection and not
only the past export. |
|
|
(iii) State
of Origin endorsement may be made compulsory on the S/Bs for ascertaining
the actual figure of exports from the State. |
It was
decided that FIEO would provide inputs for true capturing of data for the
purpose. |